It's a shame George W. beat his genuine Ostrich skin golf shoe on the podium at the Knesset while calling Democrats Nazi "appeasers". But since he quit playing golf, at least he found a use for them.

So, the great protector of the American people has spoken. His trip to the Middle East disguised as a mission to increase oil production, is actually a taxpayer-funded political statement for the Republican cause.

Now, George, please tell us:

Where's Osama Bin Laden?

Where are the results of the post-9/11 anthrax investigation?

Where are the many confiscated videos of the 757 hitting the Pentagon?

It's been 7 years. We're still waiting.

If this is the best you can do for "homeland security", then I shudder to think how you would react to an actual invasion of our country.

Hopefully a special place is being prepared for you and your minions in the Hague. You can trust that I will do my part - whatever that is - to help make that happen.

My dream tonight as I go to sleep will be to see this nasty president behind bars, his wealth confiscated and returned to taxpayers he's been bilking to reward his companies in Iraq and the lobbyists for oil and insurance..... confiscate his wealth.... strip him of his freedom.... and still we won't have made things even stevens.... but it will leave pause before another has the audacity to abuse a nation as badly as this leadership has..... Obama and the democrats... we are behind you and proud to be Americans once more.... like the twin towers collapse.... Americans are brave and strong when united for all.

AlphaOverdawg

Brilliance like yours should be highlighted. Hopefully my two posts will box top and bottom and draw some attention to your unique insights.

Bush and McCain are bone heads for using the appeasement argument. Bush was talking to Obama and McCain did say he was willing to talk to Hamas before he changed his mind.

Deal with the reality that they both made serious unforced errors. It's their fault. Don't blame Obama because they look foolish for making such ridiculous comments.

Why respond to a baseless charge lacking specificity? If the shoe doesn't fit, why wear it? If Bush didn't accuse Obama of "appeasement", why INFER such an accusation? Why indeed? Because it's great political fodder if interpreted so, lending itself to blustering fulminations and whimpering expressions of self-righteous indignation from an undistinguished bunch of self-serving losers fawning for political favor. And because it's an easy semantical strawman to set up and knock down, even if it is as phony as a wooden nickel. Unfortunately, as the current state of this nomination process so amply demonstrates, phoniness is flying under the radar of "leaders" and voters in the Democratic Party.