The Huffington Post Foreign Policy
Log In | Sign Up | December 3, 2008
Spread Awareness - Stumble this Big News Page



Realtime conversations about
Foreign Policy
US Foreign Policy prof is late... again... as always.
- chris_sanford about 25 minutes ago
Went to Arby's with Andrew and disuccussed U.S. foreign policy.
- MDelicious about 1 hour ago
It is interesting to me how U.S. Foreign policy has played itself out for the last 50 yrs.
- baba12 about 1 hour ago
5 PM New York time CATO Institute foreign policy analyst Malou Innocent on News Talk Online
- paltalk about 4 hours ago
@Bhooshan 'foreign policy' i think is probably under 'national security' or even trade and economics.
- b50 about 6 hours ago

Links From Digg, Delicious, and Google Blogsearch

Lionel Beehner: Obama's Uninspiring National Security Team



Comments
413
Pending Comments
1
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (37 pages total)
- LAThinker See Profile I'm a Fan of LAThinker permalink

Give the man a chance!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 12/03/2008
- scroobius See Profile I'm a Fan of scroobius permalink

More and more of these articles about Obama's presidency being insufficient and de facto failed from any policy standpoint are coming out every day. And the guy hasn't even taken office yet, so there is no way of knowing just how his administration will run or be run. Seriously, is it such a slow news period that there isn't anything else to write about? Since when did every left-leaning opinion pundit become Nostradamus?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 12/03/2008
- fkk501 See Profile I'm a Fan of fkk501 permalink

My dream Cabinet:

Treasury Secretary.....................Paul Volcker
SOS Ron Paul
Homeland Security Wesley Clark
Defense Chuck Hagel

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 12/03/2008
- glassrope See Profile I'm a Fan of glassrope permalink

Are you opining from the future, Lionel? Say, sometime after Jan. 20, 2009? Because, as of Dec. 3, 2008, Obama's not president and Clinton's not secretary of state. As for Gates, I believe I read somewhere on this site he's intimating that a redistribution of funds from Defense to State is called for, in order to back up U.S. military presence with appropriate diplomatic action. Of course, he can't do that because - did I mention this already? - Obama's not president yet.

How specific do you want a guy who's not yet president to be? Why would you expect him to be specific at all? He's got six weeks to look at the situations you've mentioned and consult with his team: Why would he give up that grace period to make declarations he can't immediately act upon, especially when six weeks might as well be a geological epoch in terms of global events?

Sheesh, man, you're trying to write the review based on the casting call.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 12/03/2008
- ron_ray See Profile I'm a Fan of ron_ray permalink

How about a little chill, folks. the guy giving the orders is the guy who we just elected thinking he'd bring peace and prosperity. you can't pull antiwar protesters out of the crowd and expect them to run national defence or diplomacy. You need skilled hands to execute the orders.

and to this question post below: "Obama promises to send more troops to Afghanistan but to what end: What are our goals there?" How about the goal he stated; actually getting the people responsible for 9./11, which Bush should have done.

And say what once will about Hillary, she;s hardly a warhawk and the clinton years were a time of relative peace and prosperity. so how about we give her a break at least until the administration actually takes office.

How quickly we give up on Obama....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 12/03/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (37 pages total)

You must be